Rock music has been a popular genre since the 1950s and has often been associated with controversy and rebellion. However, the idea of when rock music stopped being dangerous is subjective and can vary depending on an individual’s perspective.
According to an article published in The Guardian, “the idea of rock ‘n’ roll being a threat has always been a myth. It has never been dangerous to anyone except those who fear the prospect of young people having fun.” The article argues that the perception of rock music as dangerous is a result of societal fears of youth rebellion and the fear of the unknown.
While rock music has always pushed boundaries and challenged societal norms, it can be argued that the perceived danger of rock music has decreased over time. In the 1950s and 1960s, rock music was associated with youth rebellion and anti-establishment attitudes. Bands like The Beatles and The Rolling Stones were seen as a threat to traditional values and were often met with controversy and criticism.
However, as rock music became more mainstream in the 1970s and 1980s, the perception of it as dangerous began to wane. The emergence of corporate rock and the commercialization of the music industry resulted in a more sanitized version of rock music that was less subversive and challenging.
Moreover, the rise of hip-hop in the 1980s and 1990s shifted the focus of youth rebellion away from rock music. Hip-hop became the new genre associated with anti-establishment attitudes and controversial lyrics.
In conclusion, the idea of rock music being dangerous is subjective and can vary depending on an individual’s perspective. While rock music has always challenged societal norms and pushed boundaries, the perception of it as dangerous has decreased over time. The rise of corporate rock and the commercialization of the music industry, as well as the emergence of hip-hop as the genre associated with youth rebellion, has contributed to this shift in perception.
